'Legal Ethics Essay\r'

'I. attorney and Society a. Observations i. pursuant(predicate) to incur 1.03, CPR, integrity refutation counsel manifested to the genuine court that he does non wish to postpone the subject field again, the same having been previously postponed for four times already because of the prosecution’s failure to present their witness.\r\nII. Lawyer and the Legal Profession b. Observations iii. Respect between defense counsels and fiscal iv. Address each other with assess v. Candid and Friendly vi. After hearing, counsels for accused approached prosecutor and bid their goodbyes, with laughs, as if they were really close friends vii. Pursuant to canon 8, fiscal and defense counsel (female), during their grade and ball up examinations, respectively, never used offensive talking to whenever they have objections during the examination of the witnesses.\r\nIII. Lawyer and Courts\r\nc. Observations viii. Treat military unit with respect ix. No sign of any revolt or disrespe ct to Judge Danilo Galvez, despite laudation of the latter of postponement of his facial expression. x. Pursuant to 10.03, procedure, there was no showing that any of the lawyers violated any adjectival rules of the court. xi. Pursuant to canon 11 and the rules thereof, all lawyers duly appeared at their respective hearings; they were all properly dressed to kill(p) when they came to court; and no offensive or jeopardize language were used, especially in one limited case where there was a direct and cross examinations xii. Pursuant to rule 12.07, during the cross examination of attorney of the witness of the fiscal, she never, even for once, harassed the witness. She addressed her questions to him precise calmly and respectfully. xiii.\r\nIV. Lawyer and Client d. Observations xiv. In one case, the counsel for the defense manifested that if it be okay with the honor fitted enunciate and the court that the trial so impress because the same has been postponed 4 times already; save prosecutor insisted for the postponement and reassured the court that on the next hearing they allow be able to present their witness; judge granted postponement, â€Å"in the interest of justice” xv. In another case, the prosecutor objected to the manifestation by the opposing counsel to drop the case; the crusade for the proposed dismissal was because the prosecutor was not present at the last hearing; the reason for the objection was that the counsel looking to dismiss the case was also absent the previous hearing; judge said that both of you have been absent in one of the hearings, in the interest of justice, case will be postponed and will resume.\r\n'